RE
RING ENERGY, INC. (REI)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 was operationally solid but optically messy: production landed above midpoint (20,789 Boe/d) with LOE at $10.73/Boe (below guidance), yet a $72.9M non‑cash ceiling test impairment drove a GAAP net loss of $(0.25) per diluted share; on an adjusted basis EPS was $0.06 and Adjusted EBITDA was $47.7M .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, Ring delivered an adjusted/primary EPS beat (0.06 vs 0.04*), a revenue beat ($78.6M vs $76.9M*), and an in‑line/slight beat on Adjusted EBITDA ($47.7M vs $47.1M*) despite softer realized pricing ($41.10/Boe) . Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
- Cash discipline remained the anchor: Adjusted FCF was $13.9M; debt was reduced by $20M to $428M outstanding with total liquidity at $157.3M; leverage ticked to 2.10x LTM under the RBL covenant framework .
- Guidance largely reaffirmed with a lower LOE outlook: FY25 capex midpoint maintained at $97M (range narrowed), and FY25 LOE midpoint lowered to $11.10/Boe; Q4 guidance implies stable volumes (19.1–20.7k Boe/d; 66% oil) and capex of $18–$28M .
- Near‑term stock catalysts: discipline-led deleveraging and cost control (positive); GAAP loss from non‑cash impairment and higher G&A (q/q) could weigh; September CFO departure introduces modest leadership transition risk until a permanent CFO is named .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Cost execution: LOE at $10.73/Boe beat even the recently lowered range; all‑in cash operating costs were $22.35/Boe; “ongoing efforts to reduce costs” cited by management .
- Balance sheet progress: Paid down $20M on the revolver to $428M; liquidity improved to $157.3M; 24th consecutive quarter of positive cash generation (AFCF $13.9M) .
- Operational delivery: Sales volumes of 20,789 Boe/d (64% oil) landed above guidance midpoint; five wells (4 Hz, 1 vertical) brought on in CBP at 100% WI .
-
What Went Wrong
- Optics of a GAAP loss: $72.9M non‑cash full‑cost ceiling impairment flipped GAAP EPS to $(0.25), overshadowing otherwise steady operations .
- Pricing headwinds: Realized $/Boe declined 4% q/q and 15% y/y to $41.10/Boe; NGL and gas realizations remained weak .
- Higher overhead q/q: G&A rose to $8.1M ($4.26/Boe), up 14–16% from Q2 2025; management is targeting further G&A reductions over time .
Financial Results
Estimate comparison (Q3 2025):
- Revenue: $76.9M consensus* vs $78.6M actual → Beat .
- Primary/Adjusted EPS: $0.04 consensus* vs $0.06 actual → Beat .
- Adjusted EBITDA: $47.1M consensus* vs $47.7M actual → Slight beat .
Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
KPIs and balance sheet:
- Liquidity: $157.3M (primarily revolver availability) .
- Revolver borrowings: $428M (down $20M q/q) .
- Leverage Ratio (LTM RBL definition): 2.10x vs 2.05x in Q2 2025 and 1.59x in Q3 2024 .
Guidance Changes
Note: Q2 2025 provided 2H’25 guidance; Q3 2025 introduced FY’25 and Q4’25 detail .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Ring Energy again maintained strong cash generation and superior capital and operational discipline despite the significant headwinds of volatile commodity prices… We applied these savings to debt reduction, paying down $20 million of debt… liquidity… $157.3 million” — Paul D. McKinney, CEO .
- “Our focus remains centered on maximizing free cash flow generation through continued capital discipline and improvements in capital efficiency, reducing operating costs and G&A, and applying these benefits to further debt reduction.” — Paul D. McKinney .
- Q2 perspective for context: “Reduced capital expenditures by 48% over the previous quarter… generated a record of $24.8 million in Adjusted Free Cash Flow for the quarter” — Paul D. McKinney .
Q&A Highlights
- A transcript was not available in the document set. The company hosted its Q3 call on Nov 7, 2025; guidance clarifications and operational updates are reflected in the press release and 8‑K exhibits .
Estimates Context
- Consensus (S&P Global) coverage remains thin (EPS: 1 estimate; revenue: 2): Q3 2025 Primary EPS 0.04* vs 0.06 actual (Adjusted EPS) → Beat; revenue $76.9M* vs $78.6M (8‑K) → Beat; Adjusted EBITDA $47.1M* vs $47.7M → Slight beat . Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
- With realized pricing down q/q and volumes slightly below Q2 record levels, the beat hinged on cost control (LOE) and disciplined capex .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Cash discipline and cost execution continue to offset pricing pressure; LOE beat and narrowed FY25 capex range support FCF durability through Q4 .
- Adjusted results topped consensus despite a GAAP loss from a non‑cash impairment; investors should focus on normalized earnings/FCF versus GAAP optics in a volatile price tape .
- Deleveraging pace improved ($20M q/q); liquidity at $157.3M offers flexibility heading into Q4 and 2026 plan framing .
- LRR integration remains accretive; continued CBP development at 100% WI underscores operational control and inventory depth .
- Watch items: elevated G&A vs Q2, realized price softness, and leadership transition (Interim CFO) until a permanent appointment is made .
- Hedges provide downside protection into Q4 and 2026, moderating cash flow volatility .
- Near‑term setup: stable Q4 volumes, lower LOE, and tight capex should keep FCF positive; further debt reduction is a likely management priority and potential stock catalyst .
Supporting Detail: Estimates vs Actuals (Q3 2025)
Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Additional Data Points
- Select expenses (Q3 2025): G&A $8.1M ($4.26/Boe); interest expense $10.1M; realized derivative gain $2.5M; unrealized derivative loss $(2.1)M .
- Hedge summary (as of 9/30/25): ~0.6MM bbl oil hedged for Q4 at avg downside $62.08; ~0.6 Bcf gas hedged at $3.27; 2026 oil swaps/collars provide additional floors .
Citations: All company figures are from Ring Energy’s Q3 2025 8‑K and press release exhibits unless noted. S&P Global consensus values are marked with an asterisk and were retrieved via S&P Global.